Original
Relationship between psychological distress, eating behaviour and body fatness in university students
José Luis Pino Villalón(1, Paula Karina Montecino Valdebenito(1, Carolina Andrea Muñoz González(1, Belén Estefany Rojas Cabeza(1, Claudio Díaz Herrera(2, Cecilia Andrea Valenzuela Rebolledo(3
1) Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile.
2) Escuela de Trabajo Social, Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile.
3) Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Ansiedad y Estrés, (2024), 30(2), 73-78
https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2024a10
https://www.ansiedadyestres.es
Bibliography reference
INFO ARTICLE
Received 8 August 2023
Accepted 12 June 2024
ABSTRACT
Background: Psychological distress is a constant problem for university students, it can be related to excessive academic work, fear of failure, emotional exhaustion, and social pressures, which could affect eating behaviour and body composition. The objective was to relate psychological distress with eating behaviour and body composition in health occupations students. Methods: Cross-sectional correlational study in 92 subjects’ undergraduate health careers. The instruments applied were Kessler's psychological distress scale (K10) and the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), body composition was determined by multi-frequency bioimpedance measurement. Spearman's rho was used to determine the correlations. Results: 57% of the sample presented high or very high psychological distress, psychological distress was significantly correlated with the percentage of fat (Rho=0.269: p=0.009), and with the three TFEQ factors: cognitive restriction (Rho=0.296: p=0.004), uncontrolled eating (Rho=0.289: p=0.005) and emotional eating (Rho=0.398: p<0.001). Conclusions: Psychological distress during the university stage should be considered a possible factor of overweight and eating disorders.
KEYWORDS
Psychological distress
Eating behaviour
Body composition
University students
Chile
Relación entre el malestar psicológico, la conducta alimentaria y la grasa corporal en estudiantes universitarios
Ansiedad y Estrés, (2024), 30(2), 73-78
https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2024a10
https://www.ansiedadyestres.es
Bibliography reference
RESUMEN
Antecedentes: El malestar psicológico es un problema constante para los estudiantes universitarios, puede estar relacionado con el exceso de trabajo académico, el miedo al fracaso, el agotamiento emocional y las presiones sociales, lo que podría afectar la conducta alimentaria y la composición corporal. El objetivo fue relacionar el malestar psicológico con la conducta alimentaria y la composición corporal en estudiantes del área de salud. Métodos: Estudio transversal correlacional en 92 sujetos de las carreras de salud de pregrado. Los instrumentos aplicados fueron la escala de malestar psicológico de Kessler (K10) y el Cuestionario alimentario de tres factores (TFEQ), la composición corporal se determinó mediante bioimpedanciometría multifrecuencia. Se utilizó la Rho de Spearman para determinar las correlaciones. Resultados: El 57% de la muestra presentó malestar psicológico alto o muy alto, el malestar psicológico se correlacionó significativamente con el porcentaje de grasa (Rho=0.269: p=0.009), y con los tres factores del TFEQ: restricción cognitiva (Rho=0.296: p=0.004), alimentación descontrolada (Rho=0.289: p=0.005) y alimentación emocional (Rho=0.398: p<0.001). Conclusiones: El malestar psicológico durante la etapa universitaria debe ser considerado un posible factor de sobrepeso y trastornos alimentarios.
PALABRAS CLAVE
Malestar psicológico
Conducta alimentaria
Composición corporal
Estudiantes universitarios
Chile
Introduction
University health occupations students are usually subjected to many factors that can alter their psychological stability during their university stay (Jerez-Mendoza & Oyarzo-Barría, 2015), for example; excessive academic load, fear of failure, emotional exhaustion and social pressures (Liu & Lu, 2012) could develop some degree of psychological distress in students, understood as experiencing emotional suffering that can manifest as feelings of stress, anxiety, depressed mood and exhaustion (Dendle et al., 2018), psychological alterations that can affect 30, 40 and 27% of university students for depression, anxiety and stress respectively (Patten & Vaterlaus, 2021), these conditions are inversely related to academic satisfaction and motivation (Chraif, 2015), and could, in the long term, be a trigger for chronic stress (Pozos-Radillo et al., 2014) causing clinical symptoms such as increased heart rate and high blood pressure (Conley & Lehman, 2012). Psychological Distress can increase from the beginning of university life (J.-M. March-Amengual et al., 2022). In Chile, there is evidence that 98% of higher education students have some altered or psychological distress (Jerez-Mendoza & Oyarzo-Barría, 2015). This condition could affect the choice of food, in fact, a tendency to develop and maintain eating pathologies in university students, especially those oriented towards food addiction, has been described (Gonçalves et al., 2022) in addition, other studies indicate that anxiety in university students is significantly correlated with total fat and saturated fat intake (G. Díaz et al., 2023). It has been described that psychological alterations can produce a defect in self-control during the choice of food, especially for foods with a high energy density, which can lead students to be overweight or obese (Maier et al., 2015) in fact, it has been described that daily stress activates brain regions involved in the evaluation of food and decreases the activity of prefrontal regions related to self-control, which can lead students to overeat (Neseliler et al., 2017), contributing to the development of overweight and obesity.
Psychological distress can be identified by various tools, including the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) (Table 1). This instrument is increasingly used for clinical and epidemiological purposes and even in some countries, to analyze data from National Health Surveys, without differences from other instruments (Andrews & Slade, 2001; Chirwa et al., 2020; Enticott et al., 2018). It is a scale that has multiple validation studies in different populations and contexts (Hoffman et al., 2022; Milkias et al., 2022; Sampasa-Kanyinga et al., 2018; Uddin et al., 2018), therefore, it is a reliable instrument. Studies have even shown a significant association between K10 scores and body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides (Yu et al., 2021) and with eating behaviour (Beaudequin et al., 2021). In university students, it has been determined that the K-10 score is related to sleep quality, but not to academic performance (Alotaibi et al., 2020) although other research has linked the K10 score to academic failure (Jaisoorya et al., 2017). But there are few reports related to the relationship between the K10 scale score with eating behaviour and body composition in university students.
The objective of this research was to relate perceived psychological distress to eating behaviour and body composition in university students in the health area of a regional university in Chile.
Methods
Participants
A non-experimental, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out, the population universe was made up of all the students of the faculty of health of a regional university in Chile, with a total enrolment of 1,227 students. A sample size of 86 (7%) students was calculated with 95% confidence, seeking a precision of 5% and assuming an approximate value of 0.5 in the correlation between the psychological distress score and body mass index (BMI). The selection of participants (sampling) was non-probabilistic for convenience, by calling volunteers. Posters were produced with the contact details of the researchers and the study, which were distributed on the university campus, students interested in participating were given a characterisation survey to identify inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those selected were then called to participate, until the sample size was completed.
Undergraduate students, between 18 and 30 years old, assigned to the Faculty of Health were included. Pregnant women, students with children or with some chronic diseases were excluded. The volunteers received a simple but fully explained of the study to later sign an informed consent. The research was safeguarded under international (Declaration of Helsinki) and Chilean ethical standards: Law Nº 20.120, "on scientific research on the human being, its genome, and prohibits human cloning", 2006 (Government of Chile). The study was approved by the School of Nutrition and Dietetics of the Universidad Santo Tomás.
InstrumentsThree tools were then applied: 1) Structured characterization survey (sociodemographic background) 2) Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) (Kessler & Mroczek, 1992); this tool evaluates non-specific psychological distress in the last month. The instrument contains 10 items with a five-point Likert scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=many times, 5=always) (Table 1), and has various validation studies in various populations (Aranguren, 2010; Pereira et al., 2019). 3) Finally, the Eating Behaviour Test “Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ)” was applied (Stunkard & Messick, 1985), this instrument is made up of three subscales or factors; (a) Cognitive Restraint (CR), defined as a conscious restriction of food intake aimed at controlling body weight and/or promoting weight loss; (b) Emotional Eating (EE), which refers to the tendency to eat more than usual due to a loss of control over intake with a subjective feeling of hunger; and (c) Uncontrolled Eating (UE), defined as the inability to resist emotional cues and eat in response to different negative emotions. These subscales are made up of six, three, and nine items, respectively, with responses on a 4-point Likert scale (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, and 4=strongly disagree), an instrumen
t that also has multiple reliability studies. (Jáuregui-Lobera et al., 2014; Mostafavi et al., 2017). The time to answer the questionnaire was not limited.Subsequently, each participant was called to a nutritional evaluation appointment, to determine their body composition.
ProcedureThe procedures were determined with the subjects fasting for 8-10 hours, the participants arrived between 8:00-9:00 AM at the nutritional evaluation laboratory, and after the measurements, all received a healthy snack (juice and cereal bar).
Blood pressure (Omron HEM-CR24, Bannockburn, IL, USA), weight, height (SECA 769, Hamburg, Germany) and waist circumference (SECA 201, Hamburg, Germany) were determined using the techniques of the World Health Organization. Health (WHO, 1995). Body composition was determined by Bioimpedancemetry (Rice Lake, D-1000-3, Wisconsin, USA), obtaining; Fat-Free Mass (FFM-Kg) and Fat Mass (FM%) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Data AnalysisThe internal consistency was determined with Cronbach's alpha model, and the differences by sex were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney or t-Student test according to the result of the Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons of proportions were analyzed with Chi2. Correlation analyses were carried out with Spearman's Rho or Pearson's r. A significance level was 0.05 and used the program IBM-SPSS Statistics 19 for Windows, Spanish version (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
92 students were evaluated, 7% more than the calculated sample (n=86). Women represented 75% (n=69). Nursing students were 47% (n=43), followed by nutrition and dietetics (33%, n=30), 14% (n=13) were phonoaudiologists, and the remaining 6% (n=6) were kinesiology students. The mean age was 22.2 years with no differences by sex.
The anthropometric and body composition characteristics are shown in Table 2. 62% (n=57) of the sample presented a normal nutritional status, while 38% (n=35) presented overweight (30% BMI >25 and 8% BMI>30), low weight wasn't found (IMC<18.5). Weight (p<0.001), height (p<0.001), waist circumference (p<0.01) and FFM (p<0.001) were higher in men, while the percentage of fat was higher in women (p<0.001) (Table 2).
The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was applied to all the subjects, and it was possible to determine an adequate internal consistency with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.765, by eliminating question 18 the index could increase to 0.810. but, in this work, the confirmatory analysis of TFEQ wasn't doing it. The Cognitive Restriction (CR), Emotional Eating (EE) and Uncontrolled Eating (UE) subscales obtained a values of 0.791, 0.716 and 0.883 respectively, so each subscale or factor has adequate internal consistency, therefore it is necessary to fully apply the instrument. The subjects presented an average of 2.66 ± 0.65 points in the UE subscale, 2.67 ± 0.72 in EE and 3.19 ± 0.73 points in CR. No significant differences were observed between sex (p=0.845, p=0.202 and p=0.148 respectively - Mann-Whitney U test).
According to the responses provided by the participants, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.864). An average score of 23.47 ± 6.39 (range 12-42) points were determined without finding differences by sex (p=0.148). According to the instrument's classification, 15% (n=16) present very high psychological distress, 38% (n=41) high, 29% (n=32) moderate, and 10% (n=11) low, without dependence of sex (?2 5.455; gl=3: p=0.141).
A significant positive correlation was found between the K-10 score and the percentage of fat, so the higher the perception of psychological distress, the higher the percentage of body fat (Figure 1). When we performed an analysis by gender, the significance was lost, but a trend is observed in males (p=0.061). A significant positive correlation of K-10 with BMI was also identified, but only in men (p=0.041) (Table 3).
We found a positive relationship between K-10 and TFEQ that was significant in all factors, as well as with the total score. When performing the analysis by gender, these positive correlations are maintained in men, but the correlations of the K-10 score with the UE and CR subscales lose significance in women (Table 4).
Discussion
Currently, there is great concern about the eating behaviour of higher education students, since it is an age range in tension due to their changes in habits that end up increasing cardiovascular risk factors, as we have previously mentioned (C. Díaz et al., 2019). This new lifestyle brings with it, in most cases, an inadequate diet and academic concerns that could develop psychological distress, which can be understood as a stressful factor even on a moral level that can generate dysfunction in the organism. (Mosqueda-Díaz et al., 2016), it has been described that in challenging academic situations, psychological distress may be related to eating disorders (Antúnez & Vinet, 2013), which can further affect the health of students.
In our study, psychological distress was present in 90% of the students surveyed, a lower percentage than those described by other authors in Chile (98%) (Jerez-Mendoza & Oyarzo-Barría, 2015). On the other hand, the average score of the K-10 instrument (23.5 points) was higher than that reported in the general population (14.9) (Slade et al., 2011) and in Mexican university students (19.3) (Torralba et al., 2018), also higher than reported in adolescents with inflammatory bowel diseases (21.6). (Halloran et al., 2020) and even higher than the average score of people with a history of body burns (19.5). (Wasiak et al., 2013). This situation is quite worrying since the maintenance of this condition could develop chronic stress in students (Pozos-Radillo et al., 2014) and promote the development of other diseases.
It is well known that there is a relationship between emotional states and eating behaviours (Macht, 2008). Some authors have described that stress is not related to the hormones associated with the sensation of hunger (Kiessl & Laessle, 2017), other researchers propose the existence of a vicious circle from stress to obesity that is related to physiological changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and stimulation of hormone production (leptin, ghrelin and neuropeptide Y) (Tomiyama, 2019), which progressively develops a positive energy balance, favouring the accumulation of energy reserves in the form of fat, a situation that can lead to the development of obesity and thus increase the risk of non-communicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, among others (Schetz et al., 2019).
In our study, the K-10 score was positively correlated with body fat percentage and BMI especially in men, while other researchers have found associations of K-10 with BMI in women. (Gu et al., 2013). Studies using other scales have shown that perceived stress is negatively associated with BMI, especially in men, but not in women (Suglia et al., 2017), so this relationship between stress and body weight could be influenced by the type of instrument used.
In our research, psychological distress was positively associated with an increase in the factor "emotional eating" (EA) in males and females, which could contribute to an increase in food intake increasing body fat mass. It has been reported that adolescents with higher EA scores have a higher intake of snack foods (de Lauzon et al., 2004) with a genetic association for a taste for sweet and fatty foods (Keskitalo et al., 2008).
Recent research in the Chilean population has shown that the dimensions of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) instrument are significantly related to body composition variables. Pacheco et al. described in young adults (18-25 years) the relationship between the factors of the instrument with body composition and obesity variables. (Pacheco et al., 2021) as well as other researchers (Löffler et al., 2015; Martins et al., 2021). In our research, we also found significant associations, especially between AE with BMI, waist circumference and fat percentage (data not shown), findings that validate the use of the instrument.
It is important to highlight that the reliability values of both instruments (TFEQ and K-10) were similar to others previously reported. (Aranguren, 2010; Kavazidou et al., 2012; Mostafavi et al., 2017; Vargas Terrez et al., 2011).
Social pressures are increasingly high in a vertical and competitive type of society.
The study had some limitations such as the disparity of subjects according to gender, the male sample was only 33% of the female sample, so the results should be interpreted with caution. The sample size is representative only for the university where the research was conducted, and extrapolation of results should be done considering this information. The design of this study was cross-sectional; therefore, the results did not include the pre-university psychological health status of the participants. Prospective studies will be needed to follow up students in higher education and to develop and evaluate interventions to reduce the effect of psychological distress.
We can conclude, therefore, that it is not only the status, role and set of roles that are relevant, but that these pressures constrain individuals in such a way that they end up modifying their social practices (Giddens & Sutton, 2014), Thus, psychological distress ends up modifying the behaviour and eating habits of university students.
This should be a warning signal for Chilean higher education institutions and a reminder to consider psychological distress during the academic period as a factor that modifies eating behaviours and thus nutritional aspects, which can lead to pathological alterations.
Funding
This work was funded by the Centro de Estudios en Alimentación y Nutrición SpA, Chile (CENAN) https//: www.cenan.org (Cod: 20190102)
References
Alotaibi, A., Alosaimi, F., Alajlan, A., & Bin Abdulrahman, K. (2020). The relationship between sleep quality, stress, and academic performance among medical students. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 27(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.4103/JFCM.JFCM_132_19
Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-842X.2001.TB00310.X
Antúnez, Z., & Vinet, E. V. (2013). Problemas de salud mental en estudiantes de una universidad regional chilena. Revista Médica de Chile, 141(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000200010
Aranguren, M. (2010). Adaptación argentina de la Escala de Malestar Psicológico de Kessler (K10). Revista de Psicología, 28(2 SE-Artículos). https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201002.005
Beaudequin, D., Schwenn, P., McLoughlin, L. T., Parker, M., Boyes, A., Simcock, G., Lagopoulos, J., & Hermens, D. F. (2021). A novel, complex systems approach to modelling risk of psychological distress in young adolescents. Scientific Reports 2021 11:1, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88932-y
Chirwa, G. C., Suhrcke, M., & Moreno-Serra, R. (2020). The Impact of Ghana’s National Health Insurance on Psychological Distress. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 18(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40258-019-00515-1
Chraif, M. (2015). Correlative Study between Academic Satisfaction, Workload and Level of Academic Stress at 3rd Grade Students at Psychology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 419–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.317
Conley, K. M., & Lehman, B. J. (2012). Test anxiety and cardiovascular responses to daily academic stressors. Stress and Health : Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1399
de Lauzon, B., Romon, M., Deschamps, V., Lafay, L., Borys, J.-M., Karlsson, J., Ducimetière, P., & Charles, M. A. (2004). The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 is able to distinguish among different eating patterns in a general population. The Journal of Nutrition, 134(9), 2372–2380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.9.2372
Dendle, C., Baulch, J., Pellicano, R., Hay, M., Lichtwark, I., Ayoub, S., Clarke, D. M., Morand, E. F., Kumar, A., Leech, M., & Horne, K. (2018). Medical student psychological distress and academic performance. Medical Teacher, 40(12), 1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1427222
Díaz, C., Pino, J. L., Oyarzo, C., Aravena, V., Torres, J., Díaz, C., Pino, J. L., Oyarzo, C., Aravena, V., & Torres, J. (2019). Adaptation and validation of a questionnaire to measure food habits in higher education. Revista Chilena de Nutrición, 46(4), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182019000400477
Díaz, G., Hernández, S., Crespo, A., Renghea, A., Yébenes, H., & Iglesias-López, M. T. (2023). Macronutrient Intake, Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet and Emotional Eating among Female Health Science Undergraduate Students. Nutrients, 15(13), 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15132882
Enticott, J. C., Lin, E., Shawyer, F., Russell, G., Inder, B., Patten, S., & Meadows, G. (2018). Prevalence of psychological distress: How do Australia and Canada compare? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867417708612
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2014). Sociologi´a (Séptima). Alianza Editorial.
Gonçalves, S., Félix, S., Martins, F., Lapenta, O., Machado, B. C., & Conceição, E. M. (2022). Food Addiction Problems in College Students: The Relationship between Weight-Related Variables, Eating Habits, and Food Choices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114588
Gu, J. K., Charles, L. E., Burchfiel, C. M., Andrew, M. E., Ma, C., Bang, K. M., & Violanti, J. M. (2013). Associations between Psychological Distress and Body Mass Index among Law Enforcement Officers: The National Health Interview Survey 2004-2010. Safety and Health at Work, 4(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2013.4.1.52
Halloran, J., McDermott, B., Ewais, T., Begun, J., Karatela, S., D’Emden, H., Corias, C., & Denny, S. (2020). The psychosocial burden of inflammatory bowel disease in adolescents and young adults. Internal Medicine Journal, imj.15034. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.15034
Hoffman, J., Cossie, Q., Ametaj, A. A., Kim, H. H., James, R., Stroud, R. E., Stevenson, A., Zingela, Z., Stein, D. J., & Gelaye, B. (2022). Construct validity and factor structure of the Kessler-10 in South Africa. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40359-022-00883-9/TABLES/4
Jaisoorya, T., Anjana, R., Priya G, M. , Jeevan CR, Revamma M, Vineetha Jose, Radhakrishnan KS, Anupam Kishore, Thennarasu K, & Sivasankaran Nair B. (2017). Psychological distress among college students in Kerala, India—Prevalence and correlates. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 28, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.03.026
Jáuregui-Lobera, I., García-Cruz, P., Carbonero-Carreño, R., Magallares, A., & Ruiz-Prieto, I. (2014). Psychometric properties of Spanish version of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 (Tfeq-Sp) and its relationship with some eating- and body image-related variables. Nutrients, 6(12), 5619–5635. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6125619
Jerez-Mendoza, M., & Oyarzo-Barría, C. (2015). Estrés académico en estudiantes del Departamento de Salud de la Universidad de Los Lagos Osorno. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 53(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272015000300002
Kavazidou, E., Proios, M., Liolios, I., Doganis, G., Petrou, K., Tsatsoulis, A., & Fachantidou-Tsiligiroglou, A. (2012). Structure validity of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 in Greek population. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 7(1), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.71.01
Keskitalo, K., Tuorila, H., Spector, T. D., Cherkas, L. F., Knaapila, A., Kaprio, J., Silventoinen, K., & Perola, M. (2008). The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, body mass index, and responses to sweet and salty fatty foods: a twin study of genetic and environmental associations. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 88(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.2.263
Kessler, R., & Mroczek, D. (1992). An update of the development of mental health screening scales for the US national health interview study. In Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research.
Kiessl, G. R. R., & Laessle, R. G. (2017). Stress does not affect ghrelin secretion in obese and normal weight women. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 22(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0316-2
Liu, Y., & Lu, Z. (2012). Chinese high school students’ academic stress and depressive symptoms: gender and school climate as moderators. Stress and Health : Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28(4), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2418
Löffler, A., Luck, T., Then, F. S., Sikorski, C., Kovacs, P., Böttcher, Y., Breitfeld, J., Tönjes, A., Horstmann, A., Löffler, M., Engel, C., Thiery, J., Villringer, A., Stumvoll, M., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2015). Eating Behaviour in the General Population: An Analysis of the Factor Structure of the German Version of the Three-Factor-Eating-Questionnaire (TFEQ) and Its Association with the Body Mass Index. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0133977.
Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: a five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002
Maier, S. U., Makwana, A. B., & Hare, T. A. (2015). Acute Stress Impairs Self-Control in Goal-Directed Choice by Altering Multiple Functional Connections within the Brain’s Decision Circuits. Neuron, 87(3), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.005
March-Amengual, J.-M., Cambra Badii, I., Casas-Baroy, J.-C., Altarriba, C., Comella Company, A., Pujol-Farriols, R., Baños, J.-E., Galbany-Estragués, P., & Comella Cayuela, A. (2022). Psychological Distress, Burnout, and Academic Performance in First Year College Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063356
Martins, B. G., da Silva, W. R., Maroco, J., & Campos, J. A. D. B. (2021). Psychometric characteristics of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-18 and eating behavior in undergraduate students. Eating and Weight Disorders : EWD, 26(2), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00885-9
Milkias, B., Ametaj, A., Alemayehu, M., Girma, E., Yared, M., Kim, H. H., Stroud, R., Stevenson, A., Gelaye, B., & Teferra, S. (2022). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Kessler-10 among Ethiopian adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 303, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAD.2022.02.013
Mosqueda-Díaz, A., González-Carvajal, J., Dahrbacun-Solis, N., Jofré-Montoya, P., Caro-Castro, A., Campusano-Coloma, E., & Escobar-Ríos, M. (2016). Malestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios: una mirada desde el modelo de promoción de la salud. SANUS, 1, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.36789/SANUS.VI1.58
Mostafavi, S.-A., Akhondzadeh, S., Mohammadi, M. R., Eshraghian, M. R., Hosseini, S., Chamari, M., & Keshavarz, S. A. (2017). The Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 (TFEQ-R18) in Overweight and Obese Females. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 12(2), 100–108.
Neseliler, S., Tannenbaum, B., Zacchia, M., Larcher, K., Coulter, K., Lamarche, M., Marliss, E. B., Pruessner, J., & Dagher, A. (2017). Academic stress and personality interact to increase the neural response to high-calorie food cues. Appetite, 116, 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.016
Pacheco, L. S., Blanco, E., Burrows, R., Correa-Burrows, P., Santos, J. L., & Gahagan, S. (2021). Eating behavior and body composition in Chilean young adults. Appetite, 156, 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104857
Patten, E. V., & Vaterlaus, J. M. (2021). Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Undergraduate Dietetics Students. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEB.2020.10.005
Pereira, A., Oliveira, C. A., Bártolo, A., Monteiro, S., Vagos, P., & Jardim, J. (2019). Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(3), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.06322017
Pozos-Radillo, B. E., Preciado-Serrano, M. de L., Acosta-Fernández, M., Aguilera-Velasco, M. de los Á., & Delgado-García, D. D. (2014). Academic stress as a predictor of chronic stress in university students. Psicología Educativa, 20(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.05.006
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Zamorski, M. A., & Colman, I. (2018). The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel. PLoS ONE, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0196562
Schetz, M., De Jong, A., Deane, A. M., Druml, W., Hemelaar, P., Pelosi, P., Pickkers, P., Reintam-Blaser, A., Roberts, J., Sakr, Y., & Jaber, S. (2019). Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review. Intensive Care Medicine, 45(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05594-1
Slade, T., Grove, R., & Burgess, P. (2011). Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Normative Data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(4), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.543653
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985). The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
Suglia, S. F., Pamplin II, J. R., Forde, A. T., Shelton, R. C., Author, C., & Epidemiol Author manuscript, A. (2017). Sex differences in the association between perceived stress and adiposity in a nationally representative sample HHS Public Access Author manuscript. Ann Epidemiol, 27(10), 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.09.009
Tomiyama, A. J. (2019). Stress and Obesity. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936
Torralba, J. E. S., Mendoza, M. P. R., Blum, B., Grynberg, V. Z. T., & Icaza, M. E. M.-M. (2018). Programa de orientación y atención psicológica para jóvenes universitarios de la UNAM: Características de la población que solicita sus servicios. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 21(2), 451.
Uddin, M. N., Islam, F. M. A., & Al Mahmud, A. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Open, 8(6), 22967. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-022967
Vargas Terrez, B. E., Villamil Salcedo, V., Rodríguez Estrada, C., Pérez Romero, J., & Cortés Sotres, J. (2011). Validación de la escala Kessler 10 (K-10) en la detección de depresión y ansiedad en el primer nivel de atención. Propiedades psicométricas. Salud Mental, 34, 323–331.
Wasiak, J., Mahar, P., Lee, S., Paul, E., Spinks, A., Pfitzer, B., Cleland, H., & Gabbe, B. (2013). 12-Month generic health status and psychological distress outcomes following an Australian natural disaster experience: 2009 Black Saturday Wildfires. Injury, 44(11), 1443–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.060
Yu, J., Zhang, Z., Li, C., Zhang, J., Ding, Z., Zhu, W., & Wang, Q. (2021). Serum Lipid Concentrations Are Associated With Negative Mental Health Outcomes in Healthy Women Aged 35–49 Years. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 773338. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2021.773338/BIBTEX